<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Mold Cost Reduction — 7 Proven Strategies]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">7 ways to reduce mold cost without sacrificing quality:</p>
<ol>
<li>Simplify part geometry — fewer slides = lower cost</li>
<li>Standard mold base sizes — avoid custom base</li>
<li>P20 steel for 80% of applications</li>
<li>Standard components over custom parts</li>
<li>Family mold — multiple parts in one mold</li>
<li>Design for multi-cavity from day one</li>
<li>Choose cold runner over hot runner when possible</li>
</ol>
<p dir="auto">Each strategy saves 10-30%. Combined, 40-60% savings possible.</p>
<p dir="auto">Full guide: <a href="https://www.mfgabc.com/guides/mold-cost-reduction-strategies.html" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.mfgabc.com/guides/mold-cost-reduction-strategies.html</a></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto">你们厂里是怎么处理的？来评论区聊聊。</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mj7.cn/topic/4/mold-cost-reduction-7-proven-strategies</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 22:26:50 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.mj7.cn/topic/4.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 02:48:50 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Mold Cost Reduction — 7 Proven Strategies on Mon, 10 Aug 2026 21:47:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">结构强度验证建议做仿真，我们吃过亏，实物测试才发现强度不够，返工成本高。</p>
]]></description><link>https://forum.mj7.cn/post/4714</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.mj7.cn/post/4714</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[韩53]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 21:47:36 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>