模极社社区 - 制造业全产业链交流平台

    • 注册
    • 登录
    • 版块
    • 最新
    • 话题
    • 热门
    • 用户
    • 群组

    Plastic Shrinkage Guide: Common Materials Compared

    设计研发
    1
    1
    0
    正在加载更多帖子
    • 从旧到新
    • 从新到旧
    • 最多赞同
    回复
    • 在新帖中回复
    登录后回复
    此主题已被删除。只有拥有主题管理权限的用户可以查看。
    • R
      ray_zhang 最后由 编辑

      Understanding plastic shrinkage is critical for mold design. Incorrect shrinkage assumptions lead to out-of-tolerance parts and expensive mold rework.

      Shrinkage rates for common injection molding materials:

      Crystalline materials:

      • POM (Acetal): 1.8-2.5 percent
      • PA6 (Nylon): 1.2-2.5 percent
      • PA66 (Nylon 66): 1.5-2.5 percent (glass-filled reduces to 0.3-0.7 percent)
      • PP (Polypropylene): 1.3-2.5 percent
      • HDPE: 1.5-3.0 percent (highest among common materials)
      • PBT: 1.5-2.5 percent

      Amorphous materials:

      • ABS: 0.4-0.7 percent
      • PC (Polycarbonate): 0.5-0.7 percent
      • PMMA (Acrylic): 0.3-0.6 percent
      • PS (Polystyrene): 0.3-0.6 percent
      • PVC rigid: 0.2-0.5 percent
      • SAN: 0.4-0.7 percent

      Semi-crystalline materials:

      • PET: 1.2-2.0 percent
      • PPS: 0.5-1.2 percent
      • LCP: 0.1-0.5 percent (very low)

      Key factors affecting actual shrinkage:

      1. Wall thickness: Thicker walls shrink more
      2. Injection pressure: Higher pressure reduces shrinkage
      3. Mold temperature: Higher mold temp increases crystallization and shrinkage
      4. Hold time: Longer hold time reduces shrinkage
      5. Glass fiber content: Each 10 percent glass fiber reduces shrinkage by roughly 0.2 percent

      Rule of thumb: Design the cavity 0.5-1.0 percent larger than the nominal part dimension for amorphous materials, and 1.5-2.5 percent for crystalline materials.

      Always validate shrinkage with mold flow simulation or test shots before cutting steel.


      各位师傅觉得这个方案怎么样?有更好的做法吗?

      1 条回复 最后回复 回复 引用 0
      • First post
        Last post
      Powered by NodeBB | Contributors